Significance of London's Fourth Plinth - Revision history

Crfawcett: /* The Fourth Plinth's significance to Trafalgar Square */

2017-06-22T18:39:41Z

‎The Fourth Plinth's significance to Trafalgar Square

Crfawcett: /* The Fourth Plinth's significance to Trafalgar Square */

2017-06-22T18:24:13Z

‎The Fourth Plinth's significance to Trafalgar Square

Crfawcett: /* Conclusion */

2017-06-22T18:23:37Z

‎Conclusion

Crfawcett: /* The Fourth Plinth */

2017-06-22T18:22:11Z

‎The Fourth Plinth

Crfawcett: /* Protest and Demonstration in Trafalgar Square */

2017-06-22T18:17:36Z

‎Protest and Demonstration in Trafalgar Square

Crfawcett: /* History of Trafalgar Square */

2017-06-22T18:11:12Z

‎History of Trafalgar Square

Crfawcett at 17:45, 22 June 2017

2017-06-22T17:45:09Z

Crfawcett: /* Abstract */

2017-06-22T17:25:23Z

‎Abstract

Crfawcett: /* Abstract */

2017-06-22T17:25:06Z

‎Abstract

Crfawcett: /* Fourth Plinth Chronological Gallery */

2017-06-22T12:53:27Z

‎Fourth Plinth Chronological Gallery

@@ Line 63: / Line 63: @@
 The following is a link to my argumentative essay informed by my research and work done in my deliverable.<br>
 The essay discusses the Fourth Plinth's contribution to the significant influence of the public on Trafalgar Square.<br><br>
-[[https://londonhuawiki.wpi.edu/images/f/fd/Trafalgar_Square%27s_Fourth_Plinth.pdf Significance of London's Fourth Plinth]]
+[[https://londonhuawiki.wpi.edu/images/8/80/Fawcett%2C_Cole_Fourth_Plinth_Argumentative_Essay.pdf Significance of London's Fourth Plinth]]
 <br><br>

@@ Line 62: / Line 62: @@
 <br>
 The following is a link to my argumentative essay informed by my research and work done in my deliverable.<br>
-The essay discusses the Fourth Plinth's contribution to the significant influence of the public on Trafalgar Square.<br>
+The essay discusses the Fourth Plinth's contribution to the significant influence of the public on Trafalgar Square.<br><br>
 [[https://londonhuawiki.wpi.edu/images/f/fd/Trafalgar_Square%27s_Fourth_Plinth.pdf Significance of London's Fourth Plinth]]
 <br><br>
 ==Fourth Plinth Gallery==
 <br>

@@ Line 85: / Line 85: @@
 =Conclusion=
 <br>
-In this milestone, I covered the context and origins behind the development of the Fourth Plinth Commission and how the temporary commissions and the ideas behind them worked to represent the significance of Trafalgar Square's identity in London. Using the background information I had collected, I wrote a opinionated essay focusing on what the Fourth Plinth uniquely represents, historically and physically.  I focused primarily on two sculptures from the Fourth Plinth Commission, and I am confident different interpretations and meaning can be drawn from the Fourth Plinth's history.
+In this milestone, I covered the context and origins behind the development of the Fourth Plinth Commission and how the temporary commissions and the ideas behind them worked to represent the significance of Trafalgar Square's identity in London. Using the background information I had collected, I wrote an opinionated essay focusing on what the Fourth Plinth uniquely represents, historically and physically.  I focused primarily on two sculptures from the Fourth Plinth Commission, and I am confident different interpretations and meaning can be drawn from the Fourth Plinth's history.
 <br><br>
 =References=

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 [[File: Empty-fourth-plinth.jpg|x320px|left|thumb|Trafalgar Square's Empty Fourth Plinth<ref>L. (2017, March 27). The next artworks on the Fourth Plinth will be... Retrieved June 20, 2017, from https://www.london.gov.uk/what-we-do/arts-and-culture/art-and-design/next-artworks-fourth-plinth-will-be.</ref>]]
-Following its initial construction in 1841, more than 150 years passed with the plinth remaining completely desolate. Not until 1985, would any effort be made to fill this seemingly incomplete aspect of a square so prevalent as a part of London. The Royal Society of Arts(RSA)'s then Directer, Prue Leith, took the initiative to poll the public for nominations on what should populate Trafalgar Square's empty fourth plinth, reigniting a conversation not seriously considered in over a century.<ref>Hargreaves, R. (2005). Trafalgar Square: through the camera. London: National Portrait Gallery Publications. pg. 102-103</ref> After the results had came in, the RSA eventually came to the consensus that there simply wasn't a single piece of art that could aptly represent and take up such a permanent famous location. The Fourth Plinth Project, starting in 1999, served as the RSA's compromise. The plan, rather than commissioning one permanent statue sought to subvert expectation, sought to changing the plinth into exhibition sit with a series of successive contemporary works of art, starting with three pieces by three separate artists. Through this, the RSA successfully cemented the ideals of change and evolution in a place previously exclusive in stressing only tradition and reverence to the past. This solution also didn't solve the dilemma directly but rather exposed it and left the question of what ought to fill such a void left empty for so long. The works exhibited on Trafalgar Square's Fourth Plinth, as expected and intended, come accompanied with controversy. <ref>Hood, J. (2005). Trafalgar Square: A Visual History of London's Landmark Through Time. London: B T Batsford. pg. 124</ref>Two works stand out of the Fourth Plinth commission's eleven separate pieces as inciting particular critique: Mark Wallinger's ''Ecce Homo'' and Marc Quinn's ''Alison Lapper Pregnant.''
+Following its initial construction in 1841, more than 150 years passed with the plinth remaining completely desolate. Not until 1985, would any effort be made to fill this seemingly incomplete aspect of a square so prevalent as a part of London. The Royal Society of Arts(RSA)'s then Director, Prue Leith, took the initiative to poll the public for nominations on what should populate Trafalgar Square's empty fourth plinth, reigniting a conversation not seriously considered in over a century.<ref>Hargreaves, R. (2005). Trafalgar Square: through the camera. London: National Portrait Gallery Publications. pg. 102-103</ref> After the results had come in, the RSA eventually came to the consensus that there simply wasn't a single piece of art that could aptly represent and take up such a permanent famous location. The Fourth Plinth Project, starting in 1999, served as the RSA's compromise. The plan, rather than commissioning one permanent statue sought to subvert expectation, sought to changing the plinth into exhibition sit with a series of successive contemporary works of art, starting with three pieces by three separate artists. Through this, the RSA successfully cemented the ideals of change and evolution in a place previously exclusive in stressing only tradition and reverence to the past. This solution also didn't solve the dilemma directly but rather exposed it and left the question of what ought to fill such a void left empty for so long. The works exhibited on Trafalgar Square's Fourth Plinth, as expected and intended, come accompanied with controversy. <ref>Hood, J. (2005). Trafalgar Square: A Visual History of London's Landmark Through Time. London: B T Batsford. pg. 124</ref>Two works stand out of the Fourth Plinth commission's eleven separate pieces as inciting particular critique: Mark Wallinger's ''Ecce Homo'' and Marc Quinn's ''Alison Lapper Pregnant.''
 <br><br>
 ===Ecce Homo===
 [[File: Ecce-Homo-on-the-fourth-plinth-in-Trafalgar-Square.jpg|x320px|right|thumb|  Mark  Wallinger's Ecce Homo <ref>Ecce Homo - Mark Wallinger. (n.d.). Retrieved June 20, 2017, from https://www.stpauls.co.uk/eccehomo</ref>]]
-As the Fourth Plinth Project's first commission, ''Ecce Homo'' aspired to be the first sculpture to fill Trafalgar Square's 158 years famous empty plinth. The sculpture, as pictured on the right, depicts the chalk-white figure of Jesus Christ, shaved, wearing only a simple cloth around his waist and a gold crown of thorns. The figures size and blatant representation, by itself, are subversive and striking. Reactions from critics ranged from Sir Roy Strong, former director of the V&A Museum and National Portrait Gallery, proclaiming,
+As the Fourth Plinth Project's first commission, ''Ecce Homo'' aspired to be the first sculpture to fill Trafalgar Square's 158-year-old famous empty plinth. The sculpture, as pictured on the right, depicts the chalk-white figure of Jesus Christ, shaved, wearing only a simple cloth around his waist and a gold crown of thorns. The figures size and blatant representation, by itself, are subversive and striking. Reactions from critics ranged from Sir Roy Strong, former director of the V&A Museum and National Portrait Gallery, proclaiming,
-"Is it right for Trafalgar Square? The answer must be a resounding No. That square is a great secular pantheon celebrating Britain's imperial glories... Only people totally ignorant of the square's very definite theme could have chosen something so glaringly inappropriate" to Richard Dorment, an Art Critic of the London's Daily Telegraph. Dorment commented on ''Ecce Homo,'' saying, "Disparity in scale between plinth and figure is, like the setting of Trafalgar Square, as important to the meaning of the work as the figure itself. In its exultation of humility, of suffering and of acceptance, it questions the values by which we live our lives. Instinctively we contrast this human-scaled Christ with the giant figures of Sir Charles Napier and General Havelock nearby. Admiral Nelson has been raised on his column so high above mortal men that he is almost invisible... Wallinger's Christ seems to rebuke a city that exalts [Nathan's Column along with the three remaining plinths].. To commission the first work in the series from one of the quirkiest figures in British art...took courage and imagination."<br><br>
+"Is it right for Trafalgar Square? The answer must be a resounding No. That square is a great secular pantheon celebrating Britain's imperial glories... Only people totally ignorant of the square's very definite theme could have chosen something so glaringly inappropriate" to Richard Dorment, an Art Critic of the London's Daily Telegraph. Dorment commented on ''Ecce Homo,'' saying, "Disparity in scale between plinth and figure is, like the setting of Trafalgar Square, as important to the meaning of the work as the figure itself. In its exultation of humility, of suffering and of acceptance, it questions the values by which we live our lives. Instinctively we contrast this human-scaled Christ with the giant figures of Sir Charles Napier and General Havelock nearby. Admiral Nelson has been raised on his column so high above mortal men that he is almost invisible... Wallinger's Christ seems to rebuke a city that exalts [Nathan's Column along with the three remaining plinths]... To commission the first work in the series from one of the quirkiest figures in British art... took courage and imagination."<br><br>
 Penny Egan, Director of RSA, noted how such a work stimulated the public attention about public art and, in so doing, revealed society's strengths and core values. She went on to state the Fourth Plinth project was intended to raise the debate about contemporary sculpture in public places. "The fact that we finally have an occupant on the empty plinth is significant in itself." Starting with a humble representation of Christianity's messiah succeeded in set the precedent of inciting debate and controversy in the Fourth Plinth Projects first commission. Wallinger's sculpture made sure the Fourth Plinth Commissions pushed to demonstrate and make statements using Trafalgar Square as a platform.
 <ref>Egan, P. (1999). The Fourth Plinth. RSA Journal, 147(5490), 10-13. Retrieved June 20, 2017.</ref>

@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 ==Protest and Demonstration in Trafalgar Square==
 [[File: Great Mass meeting of the Unemployed, 4 March 1934.JPG|x240px|left|thumb|Great mass-meeting of the London's Unemployed, 4 March 1934. <ref>Mace, R. (1976). Trafalgar Square: emblem of empire. London: Lawrence & Wishart. pg. 263.</ref>]]
-The land where Trafalgar square rests today has long been a politically charged forum for the "State" and "People" to voice their grievances and sometimes celebrate. Entering the 19th century, poor working conditions, urban and rural poverty, and middle class dissension took to the streets in increasingly organized fashion, finding trafalgar square a suitable place for, what was considered at the time,"riotous assembly". While much of rioting and outbreaks of public disorder became infrequent as the economy's upswing after 1850 saw a raised standard of living for the majority of the population, Trafalgar Square continued to serve as a place of meeting and a platform for public demonstration into the 20th century. Political unrest rose in London between 1887 and 1892 with an increased public focus on 'the Troubles', a political, nationalistic conflicted over the northern irelands sovereignty. The incident that came to be known as Bloody Sunday saw protests at Trafalgar Squared turn from hostile to violent police intervention. After such a unsightly event in the square, police oversight increased to assure civil order in and around Trafalgar Square. <br><br>[[File: Anti-War Protest, 11 September 2003.jpg|x240px|right|thumb|Anti-War Protest, 11 September 2003. <ref>Hargreaves, R. (2005). Trafalgar Square: through the camera. London: National Portrait Gallery Publications.pg. 116.</ref>]]
+The land where Trafalgar square rests today has long been a politically charged forum for the "State" and "People" to voice their grievances and sometimes celebrate. Entering the 19th century, poor working conditions, urban and rural poverty, and middle class dissension took to the streets in increasingly organized fashion, finding Trafalgar Square a suitable place for, what was considered at the time, "riotous assembly". While much of rioting and outbreaks of public disorder became infrequent as the economy's upswing after 1850 saw a raised standard of living for the majority of the population, Trafalgar Square continued to serve as a place of meeting and a platform for public demonstration into the 20th century. Political unrest rose in London between 1887 and 1892 with an increased public focus on 'the Troubles', a political, nationalistic conflicted over the Northern Ireland's sovereignty. The incident that came to be known as Bloody Sunday saw protests at Trafalgar Squared turn from hostile to violent police intervention. After such an unsightly event in the square, police oversight increased to assure civil order in and around Trafalgar Square. <br><br>[[File: Anti-War Protest, 11 September 2003.jpg|x240px|right|thumb|Anti-War Protest, 11 September 2003. <ref>Hargreaves, R. (2005). Trafalgar Square: through the camera. London: National Portrait Gallery Publications.pg. 116.</ref>]]
-At the turn of the 20th century, the square proved a ideal mass outdoor public meeting place to organize and demonstrate against inequality and injustice. Suffragettes took to the square seeking a forum to let their message be heard. In a period of twenty years following World War I, much of the demonstrations in Trafalgar Square reflected the two dominant issues that faced the Labour movement: unemployment, and the fight against fascism. Demonstration in Trafalgar square frequently met high tension from London police enforcement. Undeterred, campaigns for Nuclear disarmament, anti-war campaigns, and free speech protests pervaded the gatherings in Trafalgar square into the 21st century.<ref>Mace, R. (1976). Trafalgar Square: emblem of empire. London: Lawrence & Wishart. pg. 15-232. </ref> The Seventies saw Anti-Apartheid rallies and Gay and Lesbian Rights activism. Poll tax riots dominated the square in the Nineties. Calls and signs protesting against America's Second Iraq war displayed beneath Nelson's Column in 2003.
+At the turn of the 20th century, the square proved an ideal mass outdoor public meeting place to organize and demonstrate against inequality and injustice. Suffragettes took to the square seeking a forum to let their message be heard. In a period of twenty years following World War I, much of the demonstrations in Trafalgar Square reflected the two dominant issues that faced the Labour movement: unemployment, and the fight against fascism. Demonstration in Trafalgar square frequently met high tension from London police enforcement. Undeterred, campaigns for Nuclear disarmament, anti-war campaigns, and free speech protests pervaded the gatherings in Trafalgar square into the 21st century.<ref>Mace, R. (1976). Trafalgar Square: emblem of empire. London: Lawrence & Wishart. pg. 15-232. </ref> The Seventies saw Anti-Apartheid rallies and Gay and Lesbian Rights activism. Poll tax riots dominated the square in the Nineties. Calls and signs protesting against America's Second Iraq war displayed beneath Nelson's Column in 2003.
 <ref>Hargreaves, R. (2005). Trafalgar Square: through the camera. London: National Portrait Gallery Publications.pg. 87,88,116.</ref>
 <br><br>

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 ==History of Trafalgar Square==
 [[File: 1850s view of Trafalgar Square with some key differences.JPG|x320px|right|thumb|1850s planned view of Trafalgar Square. <ref>Hood, J. (2005). Trafalgar Square: A Visual History of London's Landmark Through Time. London: B T Batsford. pg. 56.</ref>]]
-Trafalgar Square stands in a unique position as a public space in London. The squares signature monuments of George IV on horseback and Nelson's column exude an expression of the country's social and political aspirations. Trafalgar Square intentions was to inspire nationalistic fervor and command international reverence. The square was originally intended as a showpiece, a place to look at and show off to local and foreign eyes alike. Places like trafalgar square, places that serve as their own countries signs of pride, all embody the attitudes and morals of the ruling class, deciding what of and how history is remembered. This interplay between the aristocratic intention and public use would help shape and define Trafalgar square as a place of heated debate, over time fostering a microcosm of the nations political, economic, and ethical issues.
+Trafalgar Square stands in a unique position as a public space in London. The squares signature monuments of George IV on horseback and Nelson's column exude an expression of the country's social and political aspirations. Trafalgar Square intentions was to inspire nationalistic fervor and command international reverence. The square was originally intended as a showpiece, a place to look at and show off to local and foreign eyes alike. Places like Trafalgar square, places that serve as their own countries signs of pride, all embody the attitudes and morals of the ruling class, deciding what of and how history is remembered. This interplay between the aristocratic intention and public use would help shape and define Trafalgar square as a place of heated debate, over time fostering a microcosm of the nation's political, economic, and ethical issues.
 <br>
 The infighting event for the erection of Trafalgar Square occurred on the 21st of October, 1805; the last sea battle of Britain's war with France, appropriately known as The Battle of Trafalgar. Britain's victory established the country as the number one global sea power, sowing the seeds of the establishment of British Empire over the next 100 years. With the death of Admiral Horatio Nelson at such a fortuitous battle, desire for monument to celebrate the battle's Admiral grew. Despite this eagerness, it would take 35 years after Nelson's death for the land outside the south entrance of the National Gallery, just north of the center of London at Charing Cross, to be designated as Trafalgar Square and decided on as the spot for Nelson's honorary "national monument." The actual construction of the square itself took place during 1842 and 1843, running into significantly less problems than the planning and decision-making behind Nelson's monument.<ref>Mace, R. (1976). Trafalgar Square: emblem of empire. London: Lawrence & Wishart. pg. 15-131.</ref> Besides Trafalgar Square's signature column, four plinths punctuate each corner of the square. The first, a bronze statue commemorating the late George IV, was installed on the squares eastern plinth in 1844. The two plinths on the south side of Trafalgar Square came in the late 19th century, funded by public subscriptions to the square, both depicting famous English war heroes. The south-west plinth was erected first in 1855-6 adorned by a bronze statue of General Sir Charles James Napier. The south-east plinth came five years later in 1861, topped with a bronze Major-General Sir Henry Havelock. <ref>Gater, G. H., & Hiorns, F. R. (Eds.). (1940). St Martin-in-The-Fields, Pt III: Trafalgar Square and Neighbourhood (Vol. 20, Survey of London). London: London County Council.</ref>The so-called fourth plinth, located on Trafalgar Squares north-west corner, was originally built in 1841 to display a sculpture of William IV, but due to lack of funding remained empty all the way up until the very end of the 20th century in 1999.

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 |bodystyle  = width:25em
 |image = [[File:The Fourth Plinth.JPG|x450px]]
-|caption = The Fourth Plinth, displaying its most recent commission, ''Really Good'' by David Shrigley
+|data1 = The Fourth Plinth, displaying its most recent commission, ''Really Good'' by David Shrigley
 }}

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 =Abstract=
-This milestone analyzed Trafalgar Square's Fourth Plinth and its art commissions as a response to what the square has traditionally stood for. The background consisted of research on the History of Trafalgar Square and the Fourth Plinth's development as one of the worlds smallest contemporary art exhibitions, one piece at a time. My deliverable section of this milestone was a inspired paper on the role of the Fourth plinth in contrasting Trafalgar Square's Imperial original intent and its history of public use to answer the question of whether Trafalgar Square aptly represents London's modern morals and character. Overall, this project to sought to sheds light on how art can saw more about its surroundings than itself and enable us to critically observe our environment.
+This milestone analyzed Trafalgar Square's Fourth Plinth and its art commissions as a response to what the square has traditionally stood for. The background consisted of research on the History of Trafalgar Square and the Fourth Plinth's development as one of the worlds smallest contemporary art exhibitions, one piece at a time. My deliverable section of this milestone was a inspired paper on the role of the Fourth plinth in contrasting Trafalgar Square's Imperial original intent and its history of public use to answer the question of whether Trafalgar Square aptly represents London's modern morals and character. Overall, this project sought to sheds light on how art can saw more about its surroundings than itself and enable us to critically observe our environment.
 <br><br>